They Came Back


Steppes, snow, apples and the sound of an ax cutting wood into uneven pieces. These foreign images and sounds nurtured our childhood due to the excessive presence of the Soviet Union in the Cuba of the seventies and eighties.  We shivered with the cold watching Bulgarian and Czech cartoons, while outside the tropical sun reminded us we were in the Caribbean.  Some say we learned to say “Koniec” before “The End,” until one day the bears migrated, leaving us without their films of victorious soldiers and smiling mujiks.

After 1991 the large runs from the Russian publisher MIR could only be found in secondhand bookstores, under the dusty mantle of abandonment.  This February, however, the International Book Fair has dedicated its XIX year to the country that for decades was a mentor and economic supporter of the Cuban process.  The comrades who once paid astronomical prices for our sugar, while selling us their oil for a trifle, have returned, dressed in suits and ties.  They landed on the island they once subsidized, but this time to market their works, printed in brilliant colors, on themes alien to Marxism.

In the esplanade of the Cabaña Fort large, intersecting lines form to buy the new titles from the East.  Children here and there leaf through illustrations of golden ears of wheat or of people under sombreros with huge earrings.  But it is no longer the same.  The forced presence these iconographic images once had in our lives is, for the children of today, a mere curiosity about the exotic.  In their young minds fir trees will not replace the palms, nor foxes the lizards; for them, Russia will be nothing more than a distant and different place.

96 thoughts on “They Came Back

  1. This is getting really sad.
    Let me do this in small bits for you: “1. President Barack Obama, speaking to you and to world public opinion, assured that, “The United States has no intention of using military force against Cuba,” adding that “only Cubans themselves are capable of promoting positive change in Cuba.” In your opinion, do the Cuban people feel any sense of danger as their government continues to warn of an impending “imperialist invasion”?”

    THIS IS NOT OBAMA TALKING!! IT IS THE INTERVIEWER Orlando Luis Pardo Lazo!!

    THEN AS YOU HAVE REPRODUCED …..THE ANSWER IS BY “Yoani Sanchez”!!! WHO GOES ON TO SAY: “The continuing warnings of an imminent invasion, of an enemy about to launch itself at the Island, is the central focus of political propaganda in Cuba.”

    If you actually had spent some time reading this rather than reporoducing excerpts from previous of my posts – none of which I resile from you wouldn’t be making such fool of yourself.

    Why do you think your fellow travellers have gone silent here?

    Even they realise that these are Yoani’s words. The SAME words that received such abuse prior to this realisation.

    Keep digging – you are now well over your head.

  2. CONSPIRACY? DONT THINK SO! WANT TO PUT THE NAIL ON THIS COFFIN!JUANCITO!!!

    GUARDIAN UK:Obama responds to questions from Cuban blogger
    Yoani Sánchez, an internationally known dissident blogger, posted US president’s quotes on her website
    Associated Press
    guardian.co.uk, Thursday 19 November 2009 20.46 GMT

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/19/obama-yoani-sanchez-cuba

    HUFFINGTON POST:
    Posted: November 18, 2009 08:56 PM
    Questions for Barack Obama and Raul Castro: Tomorrow, President Obama’s Answers

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/yoani-sanchez/questions-for-barack-obam_b_363145.html

  3. Juan,
    I CAUGHT OU IN A LIE NO BIGGIE! “YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!”A Few Good Men (1992)

    juan
    Febrero 15th, 2010 at 21:19
    “Abuse is always the first refuge of those without intellectual rigour.”

    Juan
    Febrero 16th, 2010 at 18:34
    “Just in case you missed it – please fell free to debate it. Chingacubanyo you said in #9”

    juan
    “Febrero 16th, 2010 at 06:06 Hey Pingacubano y Bertie – any chance you will finally give it a guess as to who said (amongst other things) :”

    juan
    Febrero 15th, 2010 at 23:08
    “Chinga y Ygor – the only ones making personal attacks are yourselves (as usual). I asked a pretty simple question – who said recently ” “I believe that these economic restrictions − an “embargo” to some and a “blockade” to others − represent a blunder in American policy toward Cuba….etc”??”

    juan
    Febrero 15th, 2010 at 21:52
    “Hey chonga I asked – who said the words quoted in #3 below recently???”

  4. Humbug! If this wasn’t so very very sad it would be funny.

    ALL SEVEN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS YOU HAVE KINDLY REPRODUCED (I didn’t want to take up that much space hence the excerpts and LINK provided)ARE QUESTIONS TO SANCHEZ AND HER ANSWERS!!
    Who do you think the INITIALS “YS” refer to ???!!!!

    Did you really think this is Obama talking??!!
    “Our nation is no longer contained within a single territory; there are Cubans in every part of the world, and especially on the other side of the Florida Straits. As a result, our destiny is indissolubly tied to the United States. With due respect for our sovereignty, with more collaboration, more cultural exchanges, more citizen solidarity and fluidity of communications, both peoples would benefit. For this reason I support an immediate opening to allow all Americans to travel to Cuba, the end of the “blockade,” the end of the damaging hostilities of the Cold War, and in particular the complete elimination of anything that limits contact between the citizens of both countries.”

    To think I chided your lack of comprehension in your saying wrongly that I had not provided a link to the interview in #38!!

    I won’t be soo ungenerous as to call you a liar (BTW have you checked out the posting rules for this site?) – just humbug and a fool.

  5. Juan,
    I hate to correct you, but your quote acredited to Yoani is actually US President Barak Obama’s answer to her question. You need to stay off the booze or the ideology OR BOTH! YOU LIAR YOU!!

    ACCORDING TO YOU THIS IS ACCREDITED TO YOANI!(SEE POST #38)
    “Why not start with reading this interview January 28, Cuban blogger, writer, and photographer Orlando Luis Pardo Lazo with Yoani Sanchez in which she says many things including the following:”(SEE POST #38)

    Yoani Sanchez is the only citizen in Cuba who has managed to interview a sitting U.S. president: Barack Obama. On November 2009, with seven questions and answers posted in her award-winning blog, Generation Y, she accomplished what the government and official press has failed to do for half a century: to dialogue one-on-one with the “leader of the free world,” the president of the country the Cuban regime considers its No. 1 enemy.

    The national media on the Island ignored this historic virtual meeting. Though they have yet to publish unflattering caricatures of Barack ObamaBarack Obama (a common practice toward previous American leaders), the Cuban press has begun to target him. Most notably, former President Fidel Castro Ruz frequently attacks Obama in his newspaper column “Reflections,” a constantly updated treatise on his world view.

    The current president of Cuba, General Raul Castro Ruz, has also ignored the interview, so far failing to respond to a companion set of seven questions Sanchez posed to him.

    Sanchez, whom Time Magazine named one of the “100 Most Influential People in the World” in 2008, lives with her husband and son on the 14th floor of an Eastern European style apartment block overlooking the Plaza of the Revolution. Previously, they made a living as independent Spanish teachers for foreigners, but currently Sanchez writes for many important international journals and magazines. In their home they have established a Cuban Blog Contest, a library, as well as the Island’s only Blogger Academy -not officially recognized by the authorities- to train new independent bloggers and to grow the Cuban blogosphere.

    From her balcony, marked with a neon-green Y visible from the nearby monolith that marks the focal point of the Cuban state, this frail-looking 34-year-old, with her nearly transparent skin and cascades of dark hair falling to her waist, shares her perspectives for 2010. According to many political prognosticators, this year could be definitive for Cuba, possibly redefining its hemispheric context and fundamentally altering its everlasting differences with the United States.

    Since 2008 Sanchez’ blog Generation Y, translated to various languages and with millions of hits per month, is blocked for readers inside Cuba. However, everyday she is getting more recognized in Havana streets by persons that receive underground cable TV cable channels. As a citizen committed to expand freedom of expression within the Island, Sanchez has remained independent of all Cuban dissent organizations and opposition parties. So, even while state security agents stalk her throughout the city, and Cuban official journalists attack her in an offensive manner, so far she remains free of any judicial charges.

    To accomplish this interview, Sanchez sent her questions to the White House through a friend, and the replies were hand delivered to her in Havana. After she posted the interview, questions were raised about whether the answers actually came from President Obama and a White House spokesperson confirmed that they did.

    1. President Barack Obama, speaking to you and to world public opinion, assured that, “The United States has no intention of using military force against Cuba,” adding that “only Cubans themselves are capable of promoting positive change in Cuba.” In your opinion, do the Cuban people feel any sense of danger as their government continues to warn of an impending “imperialist invasion”?

    Yoani Sanchez: The continuing warnings of an imminent invasion, of an enemy about to launch itself at the Island, is the central focus of political propaganda in Cuba. But many Cubans have long ceased to believe what the billboards and the television newscasters tell us. After repeating so often that we are about to be in at war with our neighbor to the north, the threat has lost its force; in fact, few pay any attention to it. Far from worrying about a possible American occupation, the problems that most frighten us are the collapse of production, the lack of freedom, and the anachronistic discourse of power.

    2. Is the silence of President Raul CastroRaul Castro in response to your intended double interview an isolated incident, or do you consider it a symptom of the current Cuban Realpolitik? How would you define such Raulpolitik?

    YS: Power in Cuba does not talk to citizens. They try to present the decisions that affect the population as occurring in an open way, but in reality these decisions are made in a single office, in a closed family and military clan. The public face of power, the National Assembly, simply rubber stamps them, voting unanimously for whatever the ruling family puts forward. Thus, I am able to obtain an interview with the president of another country, while my own president shows me complete indifference. All this goes back to the original sin of Raul Castro; he was not elected through a popular referendum but rather came to power through family inheritance, through blood. Thus, he is not required to respond to the questions and criticism that come to him from the Cuban people. He is not held accountable for the delay in necessary reforms, the increasing repression, and the timidity with which he has implemented measures to improve production on the Island.

    That said, I have not given up hope that Raul Castro will answer my questions, even more so now that he knows Barack Obama’s answers.

    3. In the academic sphere, among Cuba experts, or at the popular level, is there a certain lack of confidence in a democratic transition in Cuba and fear that the country could collapse into anarchy or even civil war?

    YS: Cuba’s leaders have had repeated opportunities in the last 50 years to implement a gradual and orderly transition. Every time the circumstances have favored progressive reforms, they have preferred to make things more difficult, choosing the path of greater control and centralization. This has prevented any change, such that any opening is likely to create social fractures leading to a cycle of violence. The current government of the Island would be principally responsible for any outbreak of civil unrest because they have missed every opportunity for an orderly and peaceful transition.

    Despite the specters of a coup or a citizen uprising that perennially haunt us, I believe the necessary and inevitable transition in Cuba can occur peacefully. We have the good fortune to live in a country without ethnic hatreds, without linguistic or religious conflicts, and where intermarriage militates against racial confrontation. Nor do we have regional conflicts that could lead to civil wars. The confrontation would be solely based on ideology. And we know that the degree to which people feel compelled to feign loyalty to the current system makes it impossible to really know how many people want to live in a democracy. I suspect we are talking about the majority.

    4. To what extent do you think Barack Obama has accomplished his campaign promises with regards to Cuba in his first year in office?

    YS: In just 12 months, Obama has done more to normalize relations with Cuba than any previous American president did over his entire term of office. We are not No. 1 on his agenda, but neither have we been totally forgotten. He lifted the restrictions on Cuban-Americans visiting the Island and sending remittances to their families, and he is now “threatening” to freely allow Americans to come to the Island as tourists. Our government is somewhat confused because they are used to a more aggressive adversary, one they can rely on to provide an excuse for the lack of freedoms in Cuba. With his smile and his youth, the American president is admired by many of my compatriots. To counteract the “Obamamania” however, anti-American rhetoric is already being manufactured, including the mocking and derogatory phrase, “Obama is like Bush, just painted black.”

    5. I would like to know your opinion about the rationality of the “embargo” or “blockade” or any other semantic subtlety to call the American policy of trade restrictions toward Havana.

    YS: I believe that these economic restrictions − an “embargo” to some and a “blockade” to others − represent a blunder in American policy toward Cuba. Far from suffocating the ruling class of the Island, these trade restrictions create material difficulties for the population and feed the radicalization of the ideological discourse inside Cuba. The embargo has been an argument to justify the unproductive and inefficient state-run economy, including the total ruin of various sectors. Worse than that, it has been used to support the maxim, “in a country under siege, dissent is treason,” which contributes to the lack of freedoms for my fellow citizens.

    In its nearly 50 years, the “blockade” has done nothing to limit the material arsenal of our authorities, not one of them has ceased to enjoy their privileges. An example is the issue of Internet access. They have always blamed the restrictions on Internet access on the fact that the United States has not allowed Cuba to connect to its underwater cable. The victims of these restrictions are ordinary Cubans; we have had to postpone our enjoyment of the World Wide Web, while the police, the censors and the official media seize the few kilobytes of access available to the whole country.

    When Barack Obama authorized American telecommunications companies to negotiate with their Cuban counterparts, this alibi for limiting the use of the Internet fell apart. Unfortunately, the government of Raul Castro has ignored his proposal and we continue to be the “Island of the Disconnected.” But on this issue, at least, it is obvious to all that the responsibility does not rest entirely on external forces, but also on internal political will.

    6. What recommendations would you make to the American government and to the citizens of the United States to improve their relations with Cuba?

    YS: In the first place, we have to put aside the idea that relations between peoples are shaped in the halls of governments and the corridors of foreign ministries. Between the United States and Cuba there is a shared history, kinship and culture that do not depend on agreements between our respective administrations. For example, a linguistic detail illustrates the Island’s sympathy with our neighbors to the north; we never use the word “gringos” with all its negative connotations, rather we use the word “yumas” which is much more friendly.

    Our nation is no longer contained within a single territory; there are Cubans in every part of the world, and especially on the other side of the Florida Straits. As a result, our destiny is indissolubly tied to the United States. With due respect for our sovereignty, with more collaboration, more cultural exchanges, more citizen solidarity and fluidity of communications, both peoples would benefit. For this reason I support an immediate opening to allow all Americans to travel to Cuba, the end of the “blockade,” the end of the damaging hostilities of the Cold War, and in particular the complete elimination of anything that limits contact between the citizens of both countries.

    7. There is a younger generation of people in Cuba and the United States who have very different ways of approaching the difference between the two governments, a generation that includes Barack Obama and yourself. Looking ahead to 2010, after half a century of Revolution, do you anticipate any progress in the direction of mutual understanding, or the classic confrontation between these two neighbor nations will go on?

    YS: Fortunately, 2010 started with an increase in the exercise of civic opinion inside Cuba. As a friend said to me, last year was one of citizens beginning to express their dissatisfaction in tiny voices, whereas before that they had been crouching in fear, afraid to speak at all. I hope that in the coming months we will see those voices singing out, in a new dawn without tension, without leaders who remain in power for fifty years, and above all without the fear that consumes contemporary Cuban society. I am speaking of a new stage where our leaders do not “direct” us, but rather they “serve” us, a stage where rather than chanting slogans, they show results.

    Unfortunately, many people on this Island are waiting for a “biological solution,” which would come with the natural ends of the lives in those now holding power. No one can avoid death, and like a great Saturn who has devoured his children, the Cuban process will not leave behind a generation committed to its ideas or determined to continue them. We are living at the end of an era and I can only hope that the next one will be more focused on the citizen, and that as we enter this stage we can count on the solidarity of the United States and the rest of the world.

    Obama and the country he represents can play a very important role in this opening of Cuba to democracy, but they must do so without interference with respect to our sovereignty and our decisions. The year 2010 could contain within its days the date that we will later celebrate as the new beginning between the two countries. For myself, I wish it would come as soon as possible. April seems a good time to announce the spring. After all, April should not be always the cruelest month.

    http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5124359-cuban-blogger-yoani-sanchez-who-interviewed-obama-speaks

  6. Yubano,

    Yes, it will be interesting to see how the BBC uses this opportunity. I hope they don’t squander it.

  7. Humbug first you say there is no link. Now the quotes are out of context!!!!

    Well here is a complete question to and answer from Yoani Sanchez:(please check link for accuracy!!)
    6. What recommendations would you make to the American government and to the citizens of the United States to improve their relations with Cuba?
    YS: In the first place, we have to put aside the idea that relations between peoples are shaped in the halls of governments and the corridors of foreign ministries. Between the United States and Cuba there is a shared history, kinship and culture that do not depend on agreements between our respective administrations. For example, a linguistic detail illustrates the Island’s sympathy with our neighbors to the north; we never use the word “gringos” with all its negative connotations, rather we use the word “yumas” which is much more friendly.
    Our nation is no longer contained within a single territory; there are Cubans in every part of the world, and especially on the other side of the Florida Straits. As a result, our destiny is indissolubly tied to the United States. With due respect for our sovereignty, with more collaboration, more cultural exchanges, more citizen solidarity and fluidity of communications, both peoples would benefit. For this reason I support an immediate opening to allow all Americans to travel to Cuba, the end of the “blockade,” the end of the damaging hostilities of the Cold War, and in particular the complete elimination of anything that limits contact between the citizens of both countries.

  8. Juan,

    Quotes out of context can be viewed as PROPAGANDA and you would not like to be accused of that, now would you? Let people make up their own mind on your points!

  9. Comprehension skills??

    The link TRANSPARENTLY is at the bottom of #38. The quote in #39 is one part of the larger quote in #38 so didn’t need a repeat of the SAME link.

    How come I need to point you to such an interview anyway?

  10. Juan,

    I you want people to respond, please put a link to all the articles etc. where you are pulling all these quotes. If you notice, I always put the link to articles I post so there is TRANSPARENCY!

  11. Just in case you missed it – please fell free to debate it. Chingacubanyo you said in #9
    “You seems to be expressing your opinions without any knowledge of what really happen in my country. If you are genuinely interested in Cuba’s best interest. Then listen to what those without voices in Cuba have to say once they are able to do so.
    I thought I was listening – where did I go wrong?

    “For this reason I support an immediate opening to allow all Americans to travel to Cuba, the end of the “blockade,” the end of the damaging hostilities of the Cold War, and in particular the complete elimination of anything that limits contact between the citizens of both countries”

    Yoani Sanchez January 28 2010

  12. Puppy asks in #31 “If someday the Embargo is lifted, can someone with some degree of inteligence tells me how the system is prepared to pay for their purchases?
    Lets see how many intellectuals we have in this forum, please be serious in your reply.”

    Why not start with reading this interview January 28, Cuban blogger, writer, and photographer Orlando Luis Pardo Lazo with Yoani Sanchez in which she says many things including the following:

    I believe that these economic restrictions − an “embargo” to some and a “blockade” to others − represent a blunder in American policy toward Cuba. Far from suffocating the ruling class of the Island, these trade restrictions create material difficulties for the population and feed the radicalization of the ideological discourse inside Cuba. The embargo has been an argument to justify the unproductive and inefficient state-run economy, including the total ruin of various sectors……

    With due respect for our sovereignty, with more collaboration, more cultural exchanges, more citizen solidarity and fluidity of communications, both peoples would benefit. For this reason I support an immediate opening to allow all Americans to travel to Cuba, the end of the “blockade,” the end of the damaging hostilities of the Cold War, and in particular the complete elimination of anything that limits contact between the citizens of both countries.”

    And….”Obama and the country he represents can play a very important role in this opening of Cuba to democracy, but they must do so without interference with respect to our sovereignty and our decisions.”

    http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5124359-cuban-blogger-yoani-sanchez-who-interviewed-obama-speaks

  13. I have a love/hate relationship with the BBC, they are open to see the reality in Cuba but sometimes they get some idiot ideolog to report! Overall I have hope that they eventually see the light! Besides I love the British parliament,is so boisterous, just like cubans would be given a shot at REAL DEMOCRACY!! Do they stream those sessions? Would love to see some!

  14. Pepito el Travieso:

    In order to survive (and rebuild the country’s infrastructure and productive capacity) Cuba now needs extensive credit (as in billions).

    At one time, the general idea was that once the United States lifts the embargo, the Cuban Government (run by the Communist Party), will go to a host of American Companies and place orders for 1000’s of trucks, tractors, and other expensive pieces of equipment. Then those US companies will get all that gear lined up, ready to ship out, and Cuba will say “we want to ‘buy’ your products, but we don’t have any money.”

    No money, No problem – because then the US manufacturers send their lobbyists to Washington and extend Cuba a “development loan” (backed by US Taxpayers) to pay for the goods. Ford, John Deer, Archer Daniels Midland get their dollars, and Fidel gets his toys and begins a whole new series of Fidelidadas.

    The chances of that scenario happening in the real world, are slim to none, with Sr. Delgado having left the building in 1959. Diaz-Balart and Co have already made damn sure (via Helms Burton, etc) no left leaning US president is going to rescue Fidel at the last moment (because US now law requires a whole extra set of criteria be met before the CCP can get access to US credits).

    There is the belief held by some, that ending the embargo would send a lifeline to the Fidel/CCP, in that even though the United States still wouldn’t immediately send money, Castro sympathizers in Europe, Latin America, etc would start extending credits (in order to be in a good position to have better access to American market “Once Cuba opens up”.) I don’t agree with that sentiment. There is only one group of people who have the money, the political connections, and the willingness and the energy to rebuild that economy – they are about 2 million strong and most of them live in Miami.

    I am a little unclear how any non-Cubans (or lurking Fidelistas) can seriously consider there is going to be legitimate political settlement and sustainable economic rebuilding without some inclusion of the 20%+ of the country’s citizens that have (for whatever reason) been forced to leave their homeland?

    The 900lb Gorilla in the room (almost literally) is Chavez. Without his intervention, Fidel and Raul would already have been gone. If the Venezuelan opposition is able to take power, the oil subsidy to Fidel and Raul is gone. When the coup was thrown against Chavez in 2002, the tankers carrying petroleum to Fidel were turned around (within 40 minutes of the coup occurring) and only resumed their course once Chavez was returned to power. So if Chavez goes, I would bet dollars to donuts, Raul is quickly on a plane to Chile or Italy to spend some time with the grand kids.

  15. Pepito, look at China.Although it is not a democracy, foreign investments, banks opened up economic ties as they made their way into China. Imagine a democratic Cuba opening up to the rest of the world. I also hope that Cuba won’t follow the examples of Russia and Easter Europe where high rank communists, secret police officers and thugs got their hands on the most valuables.Maybe the Cuban diaspora can keep those individuals on a short leash after the change.

  16. Hank

    Will be interesting to see if the BBC reports will have some backbone or if it will be another left-wing whitewash.

  17. Pepito, they cannot pay for their purchases therefore they are looking for handouts. They would need the US government to extend credit and finance their purchases. Hopefully it will never happen … not until there is regime change. The disastrous government in Cuba has been an economic basket case from the beginning, needing to be suppoted by outside sources in order to maintain minimal viability. First the soviets then the massive annual income from cubans living abroad and finally the venezuelans. Remove all external support and what happens, can they sustain themselves? Absolutely not. Even with the remittances currently entering the country from ex-patriot cubans they are on the precipice. I don’t want to hear about handouts to sustain them one day longer, I want to hear about what can be done to finally push them over the edge.

  18. I just wonder if the BBC will tell the world about all the atrocities the system commit on a daily basis or will they become an extension of Radio Rebelde.

  19. If someday the Embargo is lifted, can someone with some degree of inteligence tells me how the system is prepared to pay for their purchases?
    Lets see how many intellectuals we have in this forum, please be serious in your reply.

  20. Angelic @12 You forgot Nr.13 from your list: if you somehow have a bad luck and fail all of the 12 steps you can cross illegally to Canada where a humanitarian state gives away free health care and welfare checks.

  21. perhaps he is the responsible in charge of the “advisors” now working/in charge of the Educational System, the DIEX, the Interior Ministry, the Central Bank, the DIM & the DISP.
    Applying their vast knowledge learned while brain washing, repressing & torturing, killing & controlling the cuban people while mantaining & insuring their “hold” on power.
    If left uchecked napoleon chavez will make Venezuela the next Cuba …

  22. Lets explore comandante ramiro valdes’s presence in Venezuela.
    His “visit” … does it have anything to do with the “security” needs of chavez bonaparte?
    What is the reason for this “old” man of the revolution, to be there?
    His engineering knowledge?

  23. BOSTON GLOBE: After 25 years, a visit to a different Cuba
    By Stephen Kinzer February 16, 2010

    “VISITING ANY country after an absence of 25 years naturally offers a host of then-and-now contrasts. In Cuba they are especially stark. Much of Cuban life remains the same, most notably the stifling restrictions on private enterprise that guarantee the nation’s permanent poverty. There is, however, one striking change: the freedom with which people talk about the failings of their regime and its leaders.

    Two facts shaped Cuban life during the 1970s and ’80s, when I visited regularly. The first was lavish aid from the Soviet Union, which allowed Cubans to live reasonably well despite the fact that their government was following economic policies that have been proven failures in every country where they have ever been applied. That aid has now evaporated, meaning that doctors must drive taxis to survive, much medicine is unavailable, and all but the most basic foods are imported and sold only for hard currency, to which most Cubans have no access. In material terms, life in Cuba is palpably worse than it was a quarter-century ago.

    The other dominant fact of Cuban life in the bygone era was fear. Social control was tight. No one knew who to trust, and people kept their mouths as closed as their minds were supposed to be.
    That level of control is now just as distant a memory as Soviet aid. Dissidents are still stigmatized and persecuted; I wished to visit the valiant blogger Yoani Sanchez, for example, but was warned that if I tried, police agents who watch her home day and night would intercept me, escort me directly to the airport and put me on the next flight out of the country. On the streets of Havana, though, ordinary people feel free to criticize their government in ways that would have been unimaginable a generation ago.

    I was astonished at the freedom Cubans seem to feel to criticize their revolutionary icons. At an open-air market, a bookseller asked if I’d like to see some books about Che Guevara. When I asked him if it was true that Guevara had ordered critics of the regime shot without trial, he replied, “He sent 150 people to the firing squad on one night!’’”

    http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/02/16/after_25_years_a_visit_to_a_different_cuba/

  24. The moderator needs to start checking IDs for age. Juanita needs to find age appropriate entertainment. The best thing to do with a bratty child when he is stomping his feet seeking attention is to ignore him. You guys are wasting your breath with Juanita.

  25. LET ME SEE IF I GOT THIS RIGHT. . . . .

    IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD LABOR.

    IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED INDEFINITELY.

    IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.

    IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE JAILED.

    IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE HEARD FROM AGAIN.

    IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE BRANDED A SPY AND
    YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.

    IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO POLITICAL
    PRISON TO ROT.

    IF YOU CROSS THE U.S. BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET:
    1 – A JOB,
    2 – A DRIVERS LICENSE,
    3 – SOCIAL SECURITY CARD,
    4 – WELFARE,
    5 – FOOD STAMPS,
    6 – CREDIT CARDS,
    7 – SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE,
    8 – FREE EDUCATION,
    9 – FREE HEALTH CARE,
    10 – A LOBBYIST IN WASHINGTON,
    11 – BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS PRINTED IN YOUR LANGUAGE,
    12 – THE RIGHT TO CARRY YOUR COUNTRY’S FLAG AND BURN OURS, WHILE YOU PROTEST ‘CAUSE YOU DON’T GET ENOUGH RESPECT HERE.

  26. juancito
    I admit you are a master of evasion & a twister of facts.
    Nevertheless I invite you to consider this:
    You have not contributed a single solution.
    The “embargo” is a consecuence, not a cause.
    Search for uncontaminated historical records.
    Unilateral decisions by fiderul do carry consecuences.
    The “limitation of contact” is unilateral & based on excuses from the fiderul regime.
    Who caused the need for an embargo?
    Playing victim only goes so far …
    Propaganda only goes so far …
    If fiderul really wanted it … it would come to the table to negociate …
    So far … they don’t see a need for it, they rather use the embargo than work to abolished.
    This as many other issues is not a “one way” issue …
    But juancito I understand … the one screaming the loudest is the one that is right … “my thinks thou protests to loud”

  27. Bertie – I don’t need to prove anything but I did offer you a chance to move beyond invective to something/anything concrete which I reiterate I would be delighted to respond to. And such a response would certainly be unlikely to ‘prove’ anything but at least it would be debate.

    BTW how does a question about the cuabn revolution have anything to do with current USA foreign policy and the denial of rights to its citizens???!!

    Is the following an opinion that YOU are prepared to prove wrong? ….

    “For this reason I support an immediate opening to allow all Americans to travel to Cuba, the end of the “blockade,” the end of the damaging hostilities of the Cold War, and in particular the complete elimination of anything that limits contact between the citizens of both countries.”

  28. juan:
    still have not answered … name 2 acomplishments of the cuabn revolution …
    # 16 has no accusations, they are opinions prove them wrong juancito …
    What is good for the goose is not good for the gander?

  29. Hey Pingacubano y Bertie – any chance you will finally give it a guess as to who said (amongst other things) :

    “I believe that these economic restrictions − an “embargo” to some and a “blockade” to others − represent a blunder in American policy toward Cuba. Far from suffocating the ruling class of the Island, these trade restrictions create material difficulties for the population and feed the radicalization of the ideological discourse inside Cuba. The embargo has been an argument to justify the unproductive and inefficient state-run economy, including the total ruin of various sectors……

    With due respect for our sovereignty, with more collaboration, more cultural exchanges, more citizen solidarity and fluidity of communications, both peoples would benefit. For this reason I support an immediate opening to allow all Americans to travel to Cuba, the end of the “blockade,” the end of the damaging hostilities of the Cold War, and in particular the complete elimination of anything that limits contact between the citizens of both countries.”

    And….”Obama and the country he represents can play a very important role in this opening of Cuba to democracy, but they must do so without interference with respect to our sovereignty and our decisions.”

    Hmmmn?

    And Bertie – in your litany of accusations in #16 – just give ONE example of each accusation and I will gladly respond …otherwise it just reads like a cut and paste list from the last umpteen time you were unable to deal with confrontive reality.

  30. juan:
    it seems you are having problems of identity.
    The more it is questioned, the more strident you get.
    You post questions but you don’t answer questions.
    You judge all but claim inmunity when judged.
    When pressed you evade.
    You hurl abuse without thought.
    Your justifications are defensive, not rational.
    Your reactions are emotional not intelectual.
    You hide with (using your terms) “parroted slogans”
    You get the picture boy?
    Think hard (take an aspirin if you get e headache)
    just because a group op people thinks they “own” the truth does not means that they are justified.
    Think juan, think for yourself, honestly, question everything, learn live free not just within your little selfish circle, live free in the world!

  31. Juan, your people, your country is kept on short leash.The only thing that keeps the Castro regime alive is a brutal repressive machinery like KGB, STASI use to be. Probably you are a part of the Cuban repressive machinery. I can guarantee you that when the day will come, the people will have a sweet revenge and there will be blood.51 years and counting of oppression. You better buy plan an escape route for your family and yourself. You have only 2 places to go: Venezuela and North Corea.Good Riddance !!!

  32. Chinga y Ygor – the only ones making personal attacks are yourselves (as usual). I asked a pretty simple question – who said recently ” “I believe that these economic restrictions − an “embargo” to some and a “blockade” to others − represent a blunder in American policy toward Cuba….etc”??

    And Chinga you still haven’t commented whether this is the “opinion(s) without any knowledge of what really happen in my country”? Are you accusing the author of knowing nothing about Cuba? Should I pass on your words to the author of the quote?

    Not sure why you continue to abuse me (except for the confirmation of lack of intellectual rigour) when the quote is not my words?

    BTW how can YOU talk about “MY” country when you don’t even live there? How insulting to the country that houses you.

  33. concubino

    Febrero 15th, 2010 at 22:33
    Ache’ pa’ ti chango’..
    ======================================
    Gracias!
    Have you seen Juan?
    What happened to him?

  34. For the other readers here!

    Castro has spent millions of dollars in trying to smear the image abroad or within Cuba of all who criticizes him. He has also spent millions “laudering his image” through the use of “friendly” journalists who are more motivated by ideology than the persue of the truth. Many are prompt to use the same lame tactics used by Castro’s ideologues in debating those who exposed their brutality by mentioning the USA as a excuse. The fact is that many Cubans care less about USA politics or the conflict between Castro and the USA. Cubans spent most of the time trying to figure out what to eat, than what to expect from their government, not because we do not care, but because Castro force us to live totally dependant of his regimen’s economic. Juan as you all can see just attack and leave, a tactics used by Castro’s ideologues and pretty much embraced by their “friends” abroad.

  35. Juan,

    Have you ever been in Cuba?

    You seems to be expressing your opinions without any knowledge of what really happen in my country. If you are genuinely interested in Cuba’s best interest. Then listen to what those without voices in Cuba have to say once they are able to do so. Do not try to patronize me with smear tactics that are sen as an obvious intention to migrate away from a real debate.

  36. juan

    Febrero 15th, 2010 at 21:52
    Hey chonga I asked – who said the words quoted in #3 below recently???
    Are you accusing the author of knowing nothing about Cuba? Should I pass on your words to the author of the quote? An deven if they aren’t “most Cubans” aren’t they entitled to their opinion? It is is facinating how those who scream for ‘democracy’ and ‘freedom of expression’ are so quick to deny it to others
    And thanks for confirming so quickly my other comment : “Abuse is always the first refuge of those without intellectual rigour.”
    ===================================================================================
    You are either blind or you do not know how to read!

    I care less about your personal attacks, it is a tactic that does not work well with me. You twisted my statements, so you do not have to answers to my question.
    What is really more important for Cubans, freedom to express our ideas? or the end of the US. Embargo?

    I asked if you are Cuban, because only a Cuban born and raised there knows exactly what I meant with my “Cuba Slang”. You seems to be oblivious to the fact that Castro is imposing his ideology by force, organizing the beating and orchestrating massive intimidation and represive measures to stop the growing movement of pro-democratic Cubans, who only want to be heard by the people. When you come here and try to insult me, you lose credibility.

    It explicit in your answer that you do not know anything about Cuba or what it is really important for our country. You are trying to sway away from the context of what I said, so you do not have to admit that in Cuba there is a dictatorship that uses brutal tactics to stay in power.

    You seems to be indiferent to the fact that many Cubans are jailed, incarcerated just for criticizing Castro’s ruling. You seems to be indiferent to the fact that under Castro there is an apartheid against Cubans, who are segregated and discriminated in our own country.

  37. 2Igor

    Febrero 15th, 2010 at 20:59
    juan @1 it seems like you need a long holiday in one of the 476 separate camps known as Gulags.
    ===============================================================================

    Juan needs to stop portraying hinself as a friend of Cuba, and be pragmatic when it comes to what it is really happening in our country, Too much talk about the so called “embargo” but nothing about freedom for Dr. Oscar Elias Biscet or questioning the reasons for which most Cubans are not yet informed by the government about the “Proyecto Varela”, or asking CASTRO to lift the brutal and violent policy of intolerance towards those in Cuba who publicy demand freedom of expresion. Juan obviously never has to dealt with Castro, and I am sure he has not heard of the “Fast Response Brigades” known in Cuba as “Brigadas de Respuestas Rapidas” which are deployed by Castro in the streets in Cuba to beat, and I mean literaly to BEAT tha F… out of anyone who critizes the government of Castro.

    Juan seems to be another brainwashed lefty, who never has to live the tragedy of being a Cuban under Castro.

    I would be glad to inform Juan of the many atrocities, and painful expreriences many Cubans have experienced under Castro.
    Who cares about the darn embargo? we Cubans want freedom first!

    We are already acostume to live in poverty, lifting the embargo is not my priority, although I think it should be lifted, it is not what keeps Cubans repressed!

  38. Hey chonga I asked – who said the words quoted in #3 below recently???
    Are you accusing the author of knowing nothing about Cuba? Should I pass on your words to the author of the quote? An deven if they aren’t “most Cubans” aren’t they entitled to their opinion? It is is facinating how those who scream for ‘democracy’ and ‘freedom of expression’ are so quick to deny it to others
    And thanks for confirming so quickly my other comment : “Abuse is always the first refuge of those without intellectual rigour.”

  39. Juan,

    Did you ever lived in Cuba under the so called “bloqueade or “embargo”?

    Well,

    I grew up in Cuba under these sanctions, and to mu knowledge since I was a little kid up to the time I left Cuba in raft as an adult, the only BLOQUEADE AND EMBARGO I suffer was the segregation and discrimination of Castro against Cubans, which banned all of us from enjoying Cuba’s gorgeus places. I think most Cubans really care less whether the USA trade with Castro or not. WHAT WE REALLY CARES IS FREEDOM!

    And that is what you do not talk about!
    Why not first talk about lifting Castro’s brutal policies of intolerance towards any Cuban in the island who dares to publicly critizes his ineptitud in governing Cuba?

    In fact, it is more important for Cubans to allow freedom of ideas to flow, than debating the USA trade embargo or bloqueade. What it prompts so many Cubans to leave the country by risking their lives in rustic homemade rafts made ogf innertubes is not the USA embargo, but CASTRO’S BRUTAL AND VIOLENT policy of intolerance towards anyone who does not agree with their ideology.

    I wonder if you are a Cuban national or if you understand enough “Cuban Slang” to be able to understand this:

    “Tumba la muela joroba’ de el embargo, y ponte en talla con lo que malanga en Cuba anda esperando! HACER LOS QUE NOS DA LA GANA!”

    Do you understand what this means in Cuban?

    Dejate de cifarras!

  40. Abuse is always the first refuge of those without intellectual rigour.

    By the way who said this recently: “I believe that these economic restrictions − an “embargo” to some and a “blockade” to others − represent a blunder in American policy toward Cuba. Far from suffocating the ruling class of the Island, these trade restrictions create material difficulties for the population and feed the radicalization of the ideological discourse inside Cuba. The embargo has been an argument to justify the unproductive and inefficient state-run economy, including the total ruin of various sectors”???????

    Aren’t these the same sentiments when expressed by me or Centre for Democracy in the Americas…. or anyone for that matter elicit abuse and never debate on the part of the handful of those that post here?

  41. juan @1 it seems like you need a long holiday in one of the 476 separate camps known as Gulags.

Comments are closed.